[rules-users] Comparing names
Shannon Lal
shannonlal2909 at gmail.com
Thu May 14 09:03:50 EDT 2009
Ian,
Why would '2100-100' fail by adding WHITE, MARY? Is it because you would
have an extra (i.e. 3 ) in the list? Is this the test that you are trying
to evaluate?
Thanks
Shannon
2009/5/14 Ian Spence <ianspence at gmail.com>
> Hello all,
>
> I am new to Drools…
>
>
>
> I have a scenario
>
>
>
> Each fact object will have the structure:
>
>
>
> Title
>
> Proprietor Group
>
> Proprietor Name
>
>
>
> E.g.
>
> 2100-100
>
> J2 ½ share
>
> SMITH, JOHN
>
> JONES, FRED
>
> T ½ share
>
> BROWN, CHARLIE
>
> 2100-101
>
> J2 ½ share
>
> BROWN, CHARLIE
>
> JONES, FRED
>
> T ½ share
>
> SMITH, JOHN
>
> 2100-102
>
> T ½ share
>
> BROWN, CHARLIE
>
> J2 ½ share
>
> JONES, FRED
>
> SMITH, JOHN
>
>
>
> The group names and the proprietor names must be the same across each
> Title. The scenario above is a valid case. A failed case would result for
> Title 2100-100 if we add an extra Proprietor name e.g. WHITE, MARY.
>
>
>
> I anticipate having one rule to cater for this. I am hedging towards the
> ‘collect’ operator but cannot get a clear picture on how to implement it.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ian Spence
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090514/96bfe4b7/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list