[rules-users] Comparing names

Shannon Lal shannonlal2909 at gmail.com
Thu May 14 09:03:50 EDT 2009


Ian,
Why would '2100-100' fail by adding WHITE, MARY?  Is it because you would
have an extra (i.e. 3 ) in the list?  Is this the test that you are trying
to evaluate?

Thanks

Shannon

2009/5/14 Ian Spence <ianspence at gmail.com>

> Hello all,
>
> I am new to Drools…
>
>
>
> I have a scenario
>
>
>
> Each fact object will have the structure:
>
>
>
> Title
>
>    Proprietor Group
>
>       Proprietor Name
>
>
>
> E.g.
>
>             2100-100
>
>                         J2 ½ share
>
>                                     SMITH, JOHN
>
>                                     JONES, FRED
>
>                         T ½ share
>
>                                     BROWN, CHARLIE
>
>             2100-101
>
>                         J2 ½ share
>
>                                     BROWN, CHARLIE
>
>                                     JONES, FRED
>
>                         T ½ share
>
>                                     SMITH, JOHN
>
>             2100-102
>
>                         T ½ share
>
>                                     BROWN, CHARLIE
>
>                         J2 ½ share
>
>                                     JONES, FRED
>
>                                     SMITH, JOHN
>
>
>
> The group names and the proprietor names must be the same across each
> Title.  The scenario above is a valid case. A failed case would result for
> Title 2100-100 if we add an extra Proprietor name e.g. WHITE, MARY.
>
>
>
> I anticipate having one rule to cater for this.  I am hedging towards the
> ‘collect’ operator but cannot get a clear picture on how to implement it.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ian Spence
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090514/96bfe4b7/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list