[rules-users] Understanding Fusion temporal reasoning

[Edson Tirelli]

   Talking just about myself, I was kicked off the list (too many bounces it
said) and I noticed yesterday, so I lost all messages in the last week or
so.

   Edson

2009/9/29 Chris Richmond <crichmond at referentia.com>

>  Ok..will do.
>
>
>
> BTW…is the newgroup problem happening again?  I posted this question about
> 3 times over the last week as well as some others, and I don’t mind that
> people can’t help all the time at all, but I know there was a problem before
> and I posted this again today because iI never received any responses for
> like a week and that doesn’t happen, usuallly someone mentions something.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Edson Tirelli
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:21 AM
> *To:* Rules Users List
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Understanding Fusion temporal reasoning
>
>
>
>
>    Chris,
>
>    Someone found a bug a couple days ago that might be affecting you too.
> What happens if you write:
>
> declare NumReading
>
>     @role( event )
>
>     @expires( 10s )
>
> end
>
>
>    ?
>
>    Edson
>
>  2009/9/29 Chris Richmond <crichmond at referentia.com>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am trying to make a rule to delay firing until a certain amount of time
> has passed without another event being received.  I have set up a loop that
> goes every 10 seconds in my main application that takes readings and injects
> them into the ReadingStream. These are like sensor readings.
>
>
>
>  I have a thread started at initialization that is basically calling
> fireUntilHalt() and I never call halt until shutdown, and that seams to be
> working fine.
>
>
>
> So basically any time an out of spec reading in my Reading object (<15) is
> received, I want to wait to see if a FollowUpReading is not received in the
> next 5 seconds, before I fire the results(The second rule below).  The first
> rule is there just to verify I am indeed detecting NumReadings with values <
> 15 being injected and that works fine.   Now at this point in my appication
> I am **never** inserting a FollowUpReading object/event, so I would expect
> the 2nd rule to fire all the time, however the strange thing is that it
> only fires the first time I receive a reading out of spec. I see rule one
> fire, then the seond time, but after that any subsequent out of spec
> readings received(I know they are out of spec, because rule 1 still fires
> when received) but rule 2 never fires again.  It only ever fires one time!
> This is very confusing.  These ar the only 2 rules and the only two object
> types being inserted to the stream. Know that rule 2 **can** fire because
> it does once and only once.  Why won’t it fire beyond the first time, even
> though I never insert the FollowUpReading() ?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> declare NumReading
>
>     @role( event )
>
> end
>
>
>
> declare FollowUpReading
>
>       @role(event)
>
> end
>
>
>
>
>
> rule "Determine out of spec reading"
>
> when
>
>       $n : NumReading($r:reading < 15) from entry-point "ReadingStream";
>
> then
>
>       System.err.println("Fire off a follow up reading for device: " + $n);
>
> end
>
>
>
>
>
> rule "Missed degrading confirmation reading"
>
> when
>
>       $n : NumReading($r:reading < 15) from entry-point "ReadingStream";
>
>       not (FollowUpReading(this after[0s, 5s] $n))
>
> then
>
>       System.err.println("No good reading received for: " + $n);
>
> end
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090929/fc50a1b7/attachment.html