[rules-users] Resuming the Flow: SESSION_ID, PROCESS_INSTANCE_ID, WORKITEM_ID

[Salaboy]

Yes state is there. For your implementation you can create the high  
level API that you want, there's no problem with that right?

I see that we discuss about what the framework should do or not based  
on different perspectives. We can continue forever if you do not  
switch your perspective. The code is there and it allows you to build  
applications applying the mechanisms that work better for you. For  
what I know there is no plan to create an API like the one you  
mention. (honestly I don't think it worth it, from the project  
perspective)
Everything else that I can offer are suggestions to do a real  
implentation, but that will requiere as I mention before, knowledge  
about your particular domain.

- Ing. Mauricio Salatino -

On Apr 2, 2010, at 23:58, tolitius <webakaunt at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> my point exactly.
>
> "state" IS there in framework's ProcessInstance AND in framework's  
> WorkItem,
> hence it IS a framework concern [it is a framework DSL]. Therefore  
> it needs
> to be addressed by straightforward clean and simple APIs.
>
> /Anatoly
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Resuming-the-Flow-SESSION-ID-PROCESS-INSTANCE-ID-WORKITEM-ID-tp607507p694317.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users