[rules-users] functions inside fact type declaration?

[Greg Barton]

+1 on the full constructor.

GreG

On Aug 9, 2010, at 3:58 PM, Edson Tirelli <tirelli at post.com> wrote:

    I thought about adding that, but I feel like we would just be reimplementing java, in this case. So, if you need anything else other than simple java beans, you should implement it as a java class.

    Regarding the constructor, I might still add a constructor that receives all fields as parameters, just to reduce verbosity when using the java dialect, but if you are using mvel dialect, you can use "with":

rule ...
when ...
then
    with( person = new Person() ) {
         name = "Bob",
         age = 35
    }
    insert( person );
end
  
    Edson

2010/8/9 Tina Vießmann <tviessmann at stud.hs-bremen.de>
Hi,

is it possible to define a function/constructor inside a fact type
declaration? If yes, how can it be done?

Thank you :)
Tina
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



-- 
  Edson Tirelli
  JBoss Drools Core Development
  JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100809/6d5b7870/attachment.html