[rules-users] Drools Flow inconsistancies

[Alan.Gairey at tessella.com]

Paul,

Don't know whether it's relevant or not, but we experienced problems when 
the id of a Drools Flow process (i.e. the id attribute in the root node of 
the .rf file) contained a hyphen. This seemed to screw up the classes 
auto-generated by Drools. We now mandate a naming scheme for process ids 
like Java package names (e.g. "com.company.process" etc.).

Alan
Tessella plc
26 The Quadrant, Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, OX14 3YS
E: Alan.Gairey at tessella.com, T: +44 (0)1235 555511, F: +44 (0)1235 553301
www.tessella.com    Registered in England No. 1466429
This message is commercial in confidence and may be privileged. It is 
intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this message by anyone else 
is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this message 
in error, please inform the sender immediately. Please note that messages 
sent or received by the Tessella e-mail system may be monitored and stored 
in an information retrieval system.




paulB <paul.borlin at sironahealth.com> 
Sent by: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
13/08/2010 13:38
Please respond to
Rules Users List <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>


To
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
cc

Subject
Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow inconsistancies







Thanks, salaboy.

Looks like it comes down to the compiled classes like
"mycompany.edi.Process_mycompany_edi_0ReturnValueEvaluator0Invoker". 
Anybody know what compiles those or what might throw a wrench into those? 
Or does anyone know how I can debug them or view the source?

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-inconsistancies-tp1111862p1131582.html

Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100813/52ceefc3/attachment.html