[rules-users] Template bug on "package" keyword

[drdaveg]

I am trying to incorporate several templates in a single output drl file. 
According to the 5.0.1 docs "package" is optional:

Example 5.3. Rule template file: templates
template header
parameter-name-1
...
parameter-name-n
package ... # optional

However, it seems that the drools parser uses "package" as a keyword to
identify when it has passed header information.  Not having a "package"
specifier in either 5.0.1 or 5.1.1 yields:

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: value rule "rules for reject non-header
@{id}" is not a valid column definition
        at
org.drools.template.parser.ColumnFactory.getColumn(ColumnFactory.java:34)

which cannot be overcome by tricks like 

// package a.b.c 
or 
#  package a.b.c

Are other people experiencing this?  Is there a fix planned for the parser?


-- 
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Template-bug-on-package-keyword-tp1374638p1374638.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.