[rules-users] Similar question: changing operator from < to >

[Wolfgang Laun]

Check out what you can do using Templates

http://downloads.jboss.com/drools/docs/5.0.1.26597.FINAL/drools-expert/html_single/index.html#d0e6212

What is described there should provide the means for generating the DRL
composed from any chunks of text, in any way you need to.

-W

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:58 AM, djb <dbrownell83 at hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I just asked a question about conditionally negating conditions, in the
> DRL... and this question is similar, since it comes down to the lack of a
> ternary operator.
>
> I have rules where "LINK_OPERATOR" is either representative of >, == or <.
> I am using a rule template, and the problem is that it's not the parameters
> that change, but the conditions themselves that change based on this
> LINK_OPERATOR.
>
> If I call a function, then my chances for the RETE constant time evaluation
> is shot.
>
> Since this is a very fundamental part of the rules, must I again split my
> rule template into 3 parts?  Then with the negation option, I'll need to
> double that to 6 templates?  And if I have more operators, I'll have to
> multiply that in too?
>
> So, if speed is important, should I split the template?
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/Similar-question-changing-operator-from-to-tp212583p212583.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100217/4bf7e801/attachment.html