[rules-users] Stateless Vs Stateful Sessions in Webtier

[Mark Proctor]

On 27/01/2010 13:09, Simon Thum wrote:
> Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>    
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Simon Thum<simon.thum at gmx.de>  wrote:
>>      
>>> Personally, I look at it like:
>>>
>>> stateless ->  propositional logic
>>> stateful ->  first-order logic
>>>
>>>        
>> This is a false proposition ;-)
>>
>> 'not', 'exists' and 'forall' - Drools' support for first-order logic
>> quantifiers - is
>> fully available (such as all the other features for LHS) in a stateless session.
>>      
> Thanks for the clarification. So stateless _uses_ state but just doesn't
> have it bound to the session?
>
> If that's true, is there a deeper sense behind StatelessSession not
> supporting agenda arbitration?
>
> IOW, should I reasonably be able to cook up a
> "SomewhatStatelessSessionWithAgendaSupport", or would I end up with a
> half-arsed StatefulSession ?
>    
you can use agenda and ruleflow from within the stateless session.

Mark
>    
>> -W
>>
>>      
>>> I'm not sure that's 100% true though. In any case, it depends on the
>>> kind of questions you like to ask. If you're not sure, test it.
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Simon
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>        
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>