[rules-users] Implementing Timers With Drools Persistence Enabled

[nanic23]

Hi cafebabe,

Thanks for your comment. I agree with you that work item ids are database
primary keys but in this simple (very simple) case I just decided to
harcoded as I know for a fact that the work item id is 1 because that is the
only work item and each time I run the test the tables are dropped and
recreated. So, there is never more than one row in the workItemInfo table
and the only row always has 1 as its id.
I could have stored the work item id or a work item object as a variable
(like you mentioned) but in this case wouldn't make a difference for the
timers.

Are timers working for you when you use persistence? I do complete work
items by workItem.getId() in all my code (other than this simple example
:)). My problem is NOT completing the work item, my problem is triggering
timers when persistence is enabled. The timers don't even trigger, thing
that should happen before even trying to complete the work item.

Thanks,

Nick.


-- 
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Implementing-Timers-With-Drools-Persistence-Enabled-tp923142p961658.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.