[rules-users] Timers' Week :)

[Kris Verlaenen]

I probably missed quite a few emails on the mailing list lately (sorry), but 
what's the exact problem with timers and persistence (and does it still 
exist in the latest trunk, as I know various improvements / bug fixes have 
been applied in the last few weeks as well)?

There's a simple test that shows the use of timers and persistence together: 
testPersistenceTimer() in 
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/labs/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-persistence-jpa/src/test/java/org/drools/persistence/session/PersistentStatefulSessionTest.java

If you are having issues, please let me know (and if possible provide a test 
case like the one above that shows this behaviour ;)) and I'll take a look.

Kris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "nanic23" <nanic23 at hotmail.com>
To: <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Timers' Week :)


>
> Hi retov,
>
> Given that the timers do not work when using persistence I haven't been 
> able
> to test the scenario you described. I did test timer behavior when an
> exception is thrown from within the workItemHandler that has a timer
> attached to it. And in this case the timer keeps working, that is, it does
> not stop if you exit workItemHandler abnormally. But  remember, this is
> without  persistence enabled.
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Timers-Week-tp912807p984236.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users 


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm