[rules-users] Rules not firing when expected after retracting object in list
Justin Beltran
justinb at speedtax.com
Wed Jul 21 11:47:15 EDT 2010
Thanks for the reply.
What if you have multiple A's set with 123? Don't you need to collect them
to retract all A's that match that property?
My main concern is if you retract one or more of the A's, it's possible that
you should still have some A's that are NOT retracted, so rule B should
still fire right?
Justin
From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Swindells, Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:39 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when expected after retracting
object in list
Why is rule 1 written the way it is? Why can't you just do:
rule "Rule 1 - Remove all A's that have property set to 123"
salience 1000
when
$anA : A( property == "123" )
then
retract ($anA)
end
Thomas
From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Justin Beltran
Sent: 21 July 2010 16:28
To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
Subject: [rules-users] Rules not firing when expected after retracting
object in list
Hi,
I'm coming across some weird behavior in Drools 4.0.7, but maybe it's just
cause I don't understand I how Drools works. Assume, there's a class "A"
that has a property called "property".
As facts, I have the following list of A's:
A1, property = 123
A2, property = 345
A3, property = 123
I have two rules as follows:
rule "Rule 1 - Remove all A's that have property set to 123"
salience 1000
lock-on-active true
when
$listOfAs : ArrayList collect(A( property == "123" ))
then
for (Object a: $listOfAs ) {
retract (a)
}
end
rule "Rule 2 - Do stuff with remaining A's"
salience 900
lock-on-active true
when
$listOfAs : ArrayList collect(A())
then
...
end
My understanding is "Rule 1" will remove the facts of class A that have
property to 123. When it gets to "Rule 2", shouldn't the "listOfAs" only
have that one A that remains (i.e. the one where property is set to "345").
What I'm noticing is that "Rule 2" just doesn't execute at all even though
I'm assuming there is still one "A" object that hasn't been retracted. If I
comment out the "retract" it executes "Rule 2" fine.
Am I missing something about these rules work?
Thanks.
Justin
_____
****************************************************************************
**********
This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you
have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
postmaster at nds.com and delete it from your system as well as any copies. The
content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS for
employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please do not
print this e-mail unless necessary.
NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18
4EX, United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered
no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603 8808 40-00
****************************************************************************
**********
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100721/171eb647/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list