[rules-users] Inheritance-Like Design Question
Moe Alkhafaji
moe.alkhafaji at medcpu.com
Fri Mar 5 16:08:07 EST 2010
Thanks Edson,
I tried using the rules you pasted below, and here are the errors again
(same line)
nds.when cannot be resolved to a
type MPU/src/rules
EEphratOBMain.drl line 19
Syntax error on token ""Definitions TermContractions 1.1"", . expected
MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 19
Syntax error on token "then", invalid
AssignmentOperator MPU/src/rules
EEphratOBMain.drl line 19
Syntax error, insert ";" to complete
BlockStatements MPU/src/rules
EEphratOBMain.drl line 19
The left-hand side of an assignment must be a
variable MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl
line 19
unknown:19:28 mismatched token: [@134,611:617='extends',<7>,19:28];
expecting type THEN MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl
I also understand about what you saying regarding additional things I have
to do to ensure that only the child rule executes, but I want to go through
the first step first :) Thanks!
2010/3/5 Edson Tirelli <ed.tirelli at gmail.com>
>
> Hmmm, you should be receiving a duplicate variable declaration error...
> would you please open a JIRA for us to double check what is happening and
> fix the error message?
>
> Meanwhile, try without repeating the constraints on the parent rule in
> the child rule:
>
>
> rule "Definitions TermContractions 1.1"
> when
> mpr : MPUFacade()
>
> eval(!mpr.isImportant(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_Contractions_Frequency))
> then
> mpr.print("Rule Definitions TermContractions 1.1 Executed");
> end
>
> rule "TermContractions 2.8" extends "Definitions TermContractions
> 1.1"
> when
>
> eval(!mpr.isImportant(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_TEST))
> then
> mpr.print("Rule TermContractions 2.8 Executed");
> end
>
> Also, remember that unless you use some of the tricks I mentioned
> before, both rules will fire.
>
> []s
> Edson
>
>
> 2010/3/5 Moe Alkhafaji <moe.alkhafaji at medcpu.com>
>
> Here are the rules that I created (sorry for breaking that in multiple
>> emails), I hope this is all the information needed:
>>
>> rule "Definitions TermContractions 1.1"
>> when
>> mpr : MPUFacade()
>>
>> eval(!mpr.isImportant(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_Contractions_Frequency))
>> then
>> mpr.print("Rule Definitions TermContractions 1.1 Executed");
>> end
>>
>> rule "TermContractions 2.8" extends "Definitions TermContractions
>> 1.1" <=== Line 11
>> when
>> mpr : MPUFacade()
>>
>> eval(!mpr.isImportant(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_Contractions_Frequency))
>> eval(!mpr.isImportant(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_TEST))
>> then
>> mpr.print("Rule TermContractions 2.8 Executed");
>> end
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Moe Alkhafaji <moe.alkhafaji at medcpu.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Specifically speaking, here is what I get on Eclipse when I do that:
>>>
>>>
>>> nds.when cannot be resolved to a
>>> type MPU/src/rules
>>> EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
>>> Syntax error on token ":", ;
>>> expected MPU/src/rules
>>> EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
>>> Syntax error on token ""Definitions TermContractions 1.1"", . expected
>>> MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
>>> Syntax error on token "then", invalid
>>> AssignmentOperator MPU/src/rules
>>> EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
>>> Syntax error, insert ";" to complete
>>> Statement MPU/src/rules
>>> EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
>>> Syntax error, insert ";" to complete
>>> Statement MPU/src/rules
>>> EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
>>> Syntax error, insert ";" to complete
>>> Statement MPU/src/rules
>>> EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
>>>
>>> Line 11 is:
>>>
>>> * rule "TermContractions 2.8" extends "Definitions TermContractions 1.1"
>>> *
>>>
>>> and "Definitions TermContractions 1.1" is another rule defined in the
>>> same drl.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Moe Alkhafaji <moe.alkhafaji at medcpu.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Edson, I will try that. However, I have one follow up question. I
>>>> tried to use the "extends" command and it did not work (it gave me a syntax
>>>> error). I am using the latest Drools 5.0 M1. Could it be because the Eclipse
>>>> Drools plugin does not support this feature yet and if I ignore this error
>>>> on Eclipse it would still work at runtime?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> 2010/3/5 Edson Tirelli <ed.tirelli at gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Although I noticed the other day that this is not documented yet,
>>>>> Drools 5.0.x does support rule inheritance. In your case, it would be
>>>>> written as:
>>>>>
>>>>> rule r1
>>>>> when
>>>>> A()
>>>>> then
>>>>> // do something
>>>>> end
>>>>>
>>>>> rule r2 extends r1
>>>>> when
>>>>> B()
>>>>> then
>>>>> // do something else
>>>>> end
>>>>>
>>>>> When using inheritance, the subrule will inherit the whole LHS of
>>>>> the parent rule.
>>>>>
>>>>> Integration test here:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/labs/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-compiler/src/test/resources/org/drools/integrationtests/extend_rule_test.drl
>>>>>
>>>>> http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/labs/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-compiler/src/test/resources/org/drools/integrationtests/test_RuleExtend.drl
>>>>>
>>>>> In your case, you have an extra requirement that if a child rule
>>>>> fires, you don't want the parent rule to fire. My suggestion is either doing
>>>>> this with a logical condition, or adding drools.halt() on the consequence of
>>>>> rules that should stop subsequent firings, or using activation-groups +
>>>>> salience. Example, in the above case, you could have:
>>>>>
>>>>> rule r1
>>>>> activation-group "example rules"
>>>>> salience 10
>>>>> when
>>>>> A()
>>>>> then
>>>>> // do something
>>>>> end
>>>>>
>>>>> rule r2 extends r1
>>>>> activation-group "example rules"
>>>>> salience 20
>>>>> when
>>>>> B()
>>>>> then
>>>>> // do something else
>>>>> end
>>>>>
>>>>> Since rule 2 has a higher salience, if it activates it will fire
>>>>> first, and due to the activation-group, it will cancel the activation of r1
>>>>> preventing it to fire.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope it helps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Edson
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/3/5 malkhafaji <moe.alkhafaji at medcpu.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know, from searching this forum and posting before, that the concept
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> inheritance does not exist today in Drools. However, I have a need for
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>> Here is my specific situation:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have certain rules that have some generic conditions to be fired:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rule 1
>>>>>> If A Then X end
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rule 2
>>>>>> If A, B Then Y end
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I would like to do is, if Rule 2 is true, then I don't want Rule
>>>>>> 1 to
>>>>>> execute. I have many and many of those rules, so combining all the
>>>>>> conditions in less number of rules violates our design having rules
>>>>>> being
>>>>>> mutually exclusive. That is why I wanted to include this behavior as a
>>>>>> natural inheritance behavior rather than forcing the flow with logic
>>>>>> inside
>>>>>> the rule itself (you will make rules aware of others this way).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, since there is not built-in feature that allows you to do that, do
>>>>>> people suggest anything that I can do without having to mix Rule 1 and
>>>>>> Rule
>>>>>> 2 into one rule with complex conditional statements? Any ideas?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only thing I can think of is taking this logic processing outside
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> drools, which is something that I am not too excited about.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>> http://n3.nabble.com/Inheritance-Like-Design-Question-tp430848p430848.html
>>>>>> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Edson Tirelli
>>>>> JBoss Drools Core Development
>>>>> JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Moe Alkhafaji
>>>> Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
>>>> Phone: (630) 290-1113
>>>> Email: cto at medcpu.com
>>>>
>>>> This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you
>>>> are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message
>>>> or any information contained in this message. If you have received this
>>>> email in error, please notify cto at medcpu.com and please delete the
>>>> message immediately. In order for the contents of this message to be binding
>>>> on behalf of MedCPU it must be confirmed in writing by an authorized
>>>> signatory of MedCPU. Our company accepts no liability for the content of
>>>> this email unless it is so confirmed. The views or opinions presented herein
>>>> do not necessarily represent those of the company.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Moe Alkhafaji
>>> Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
>>> Phone: (630) 290-1113
>>> Email: cto at medcpu.com
>>>
>>> This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you
>>> are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message
>>> or any information contained in this message. If you have received this
>>> email in error, please notify cto at medcpu.com and please delete the
>>> message immediately. In order for the contents of this message to be binding
>>> on behalf of MedCPU it must be confirmed in writing by an authorized
>>> signatory of MedCPU. Our company accepts no liability for the content of
>>> this email unless it is so confirmed. The views or opinions presented herein
>>> do not necessarily represent those of the company.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Moe Alkhafaji
>> Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
>> Phone: (630) 290-1113
>> Email: cto at medcpu.com
>>
>> This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you
>> are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message
>> or any information contained in this message. If you have received this
>> email in error, please notify cto at medcpu.com and please delete the
>> message immediately. In order for the contents of this message to be binding
>> on behalf of MedCPU it must be confirmed in writing by an authorized
>> signatory of MedCPU. Our company accepts no liability for the content of
>> this email unless it is so confirmed. The views or opinions presented herein
>> do not necessarily represent those of the company.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Edson Tirelli
> JBoss Drools Core Development
> JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
Moe Alkhafaji
Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
Phone: (630) 290-1113
Email: cto at medcpu.com
This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you are
the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or
any information contained in this message. If you have received this email
in error, please notify cto at medcpu.com and please delete the message
immediately. In order for the contents of this message to be binding on
behalf of MedCPU it must be confirmed in writing by an authorized signatory
of MedCPU. Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email
unless it is so confirmed. The views or opinions presented herein do not
necessarily represent those of the company.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100305/87051489/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list