[rules-users] Overriding default evaluators

[Edson Tirelli]

   Barry,

   Any user registered evaluators should override the default ones, not the
other way around. How are you registering your implementations?

   Edson

2010/3/11 Barry Kaplan <groups1 at memelet.com>

>
> As part of my drools-scala project I am implementing evalators for scala
> collections. This means that the some default evaluator operators like
> "contains" and "memberOf" need to be overridden. My problem is that drools
> seems to load the evaluators as defined in meta-infa/(I forget the file
> name) in an arbitrary manner. This results in my scala evaluator getting
> registered and then the default evaluator getting registered, overriding
> the
> scala evaluator.
>
> Has this variant of extensibility been considered -- not adding evaluators
> as that works great -- but overriding a drools implementation? If not, I'll
> have to do some internals hacking.
>
> -bk
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/Overriding-default-evaluators-tp441342p441342.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
 Edson Tirelli
 JBoss Drools Core Development
 JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100311/e96de410/attachment.html