[rules-users] Drools Flow: WORK_ITEM_ID as a flow variable

[Mauricio Salatino]

Hi Anatoly,
Please remember that this is a free service, that the community gives to the
project users. Remember also that you can always get support for different
people from the community or from red hat.
If you have test cases running please feel free to share that projects with
us, and we will take a look and make suggestions (when we have time of
course, because we are all working in different projects/clients).




On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:20 PM, tolitius <webakaunt at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> seems like this user list works as some others.. two days old post don't
> get
> looked at
>
> so let me try this again.. having a workitem, what would be the best
> approach to persist a WorkItemID using VariablePersistence?
>
> ( In fact I think that it should be a framework concern to persist
> ProcessInstanceID and WorkItemID as variables, so when the session is
> reloaded there is a clear way to know what process / workitem to look at )
>
> Thank you,
> /Anatoly
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-WORK-ITEM-ID-as-a-flow-variable-tp680939p686197.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100330/6e7e9bd9/attachment.html