[rules-users] Rules doubt

[Wolfgang Laun]

Anatoly,

please note that I wrote "please" to Puneet, which is usually not considered
as being "impolite". Also, kindly note that I asked for more information,
which,
in my book, is not "inconsiderate", as simply deleting Puneet's post might
have been.

I do resent being called a "hater", and I'll let the community judge whether
my (admittedly ironic) kidding is "hateful". Somehow, however, posters have
to
be admonished to state their problem more detailed, without people on the
list having to waste their time playing guessing games or writing replies
begging
for more information.

-W

PS: A you can see now, it was not a question of "debugging", and so you have
wasted
your time on a "simple question". :-)


On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:10 AM, tolitius <webakaunt at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> @Wolfgang,
>
>    No need to be a hater Wolfgang, the question is simple. I agree,
> examples would be helpful, but that is NOT how you grow a friendly
> community.
>
>    Community is the biggest problem JBoss has. Why is it so inhumanly
> difficult to be polite and considerate?
>
> /Anatoly
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-doubt-tp774023p775029.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100504/d9fbe844/attachment.html