[rules-users] Chained Rules

[miguel machado]

there is the 'extends' feature.. i guess that's what you're looking for.

rule "xyz"
...
end

rule "abc" extends "xyz"...
...
end

it's been recently talked about in this forum.
_ miguel


On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:46 AM, djb <dbrownell83 at hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> I know there are some basic ways to chain rules together, by setting flags
> in consequences that are checked in the conditions of other rules...
>
> but in a large system based on rule templates, where thousands of rules are
> generated, it is not feasible to chain rules in this manner, especially
> when
> they are chained in a somewhat arbitrary fashion
> (eg. True if Rule 130 AND Rule 200 AND Rule 480 fire)
>
> has anyone had this situation before?  would I need to execute this as a
> post-processing step?  or, is there any design pattern that will allow
> rules
> to be chained, preferably in a manageable way?
>
> regards,
> Daniel
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Chained-Rules-tp775491p775491.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
"To understand what is recursion you must first understand recursion"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100506/9be0e1bf/attachment.html