[rules-users] Problem in update() method

[Esteban Aliverti]

You must follow Greg's solution then ;)

2010/5/13 Puneet duggal <duggalpunit at gmail.com>

> @ Esteban
>
> i use update to  update my object  so that when my next rule is called
> it should receive the updated value  from the previous rule.
>
> so  using
> *lock-on-active*
> will allow me doint that or not ??
>
>
>
> On 5/13/10, Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If both rules are in the same agenda group you can use lock-on-active
>> instead of no-loop:
>>
>> http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/docs/drools-expert/html_single/index.html#d0e3717
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> 2010/5/13 Greg Barton <greg_barton at yahoo.com>
>>
>>   It is so because that's what you're telling the system to do. :)
>>>
>>> The no-loop modifier only prevents a rule's conditions from infinitely
>>> re-evaluating the tuples modified by it's own action, not the actions of
>>> other rules.  So when rule "Area_EstimatedRval_test_10-01-09_12-31-14"
>>> modifies a Para_2483 it will be reconsidered by the conditions in
>>> "Area_EstimatesRval4_10-01-09_12-31-14".  The only way to prevent
>>> "Area_EstimatesRval4_10-01-09_12-31-14" from firing again is to craft it's
>>> conditions such that they're no longer true. (maybe "fid2329 != eid2143"
>>> since that contradicts what "Area_EstimatedRval_test_10-01-09_12-31-14"
>>> does, but I don't know if that makes sense for your rules.)
>>>
>>> --- On *Wed, 5/12/10, Puneet duggal <duggalpunit at gmail.com>* wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Puneet duggal <duggalpunit at gmail.com>
>>> Subject: [rules-users] Problem in update() method
>>> To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>> Date: Wednesday, May 12, 2010, 10:54 PM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> hi frnds
>>> i am having problem  with update() method when i call update method  from
>>> first rule
>>> it calls  second rule and goes in infinite loop calling the second method
>>> rule again and again
>>> why is it so ??
>>>
>>>
>>> rule "Area_EstimatesRval4_10-01-09_12-31-14"
>>> date-effective "01-Oct-2009" date-expires "31-Dec-2014"  salience 5
>>>  no-loop true
>>>   when
>>>  objectP2483 : Para_2483( (fid2329>=0);
>>>
>>>  then
>>>
>>>  objectP2483.setFid2339(objectP2483.getFid2338()
>>> *3.1);update(objectP2483);
>>>
>>>   rule "Area_EstimatedRval_test_10-01-09_12-31-14"
>>> date-effective "01-Oct-2009" date-expires "31-Dec-2014"  salience 5
>>>  no-loop true
>>>   when
>>>  objectP2483 : Para_2483( fid2339>0);
>>>   then
>>>  System.out.println("Area_EstimatedRval_test_10-01-09_12-31-14");
>>>  objectP2483.setFid2339(objectP2483.getEid2143());
>>>
>>>  update(objectP2483); end
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<http://mc/compose?to=rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>
>> Esteban Aliverti
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>


-- 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Esteban Aliverti
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100513/f466e91a/attachment.html