[rules-users] Drools 5.1 Persistence without JTA

[Mark Proctor]

On 19/05/2010 16:13, Pablo Nussembaum wrote:
> Hi Kiram,
> We are currently working, through the spring integration, on adding
> support for using processes without JTA. The only pending feature is the
> automatic rollback handling that JTA provides, that means that you
> *MUST* reload the session instance after a rollback.
>    
I'm now wondering if automic rollback was such as good idea; I'm just 
not sure of a good way to ensure integrity between the rules and the 
process interactions if the current workingmemory becomes invalid. for 
processes it just loads the process on demand anyway, so automatic 
rollback isn't needed, for rules it's a little more complicated.

Mark
> Here you have an example app:
> http://www.plugtree.com/downloads/DroolsFlowSpring.tgz
>
>