[rules-users] forall not delivering as expected
OlliSee
o.roess at seeburger.de
Fri Nov 26 05:35:48 EST 2010
Hi there,
I'm experiencing the same problem using Drools 5.1.1
Whats the status on this?
By the way. It also doesn't work the other way round with
not (exists(X(y != z)))
which is basically the same as
forall($x : X()
X(this == $x, y == z)
)
If this is still a problem, how can I surpass this to get expected results?
Thanks in advance.
Oliver
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/forall-not-delivering-as-expected-tp1461552p1972065.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the rules-users
mailing list