[rules-users] Problem with sub-process rules inside multiple instances

Esteban Aliverti esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
Thu Jun 2 09:07:34 EDT 2011


It would be "polite" to have it:

Rule "Cleanup Rule"
salience -999
rule-flow-group "your group"
when
  $g: Guard()
then
   retract($g);
end

The low salience will make activations of this rule to be executed at the
end of the execution cycle.

Best Regards,

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com


On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:34 AM, HMandic <trbuhom at net.hr> wrote:

> Thanks, it worked.
>
> Is cleaning up the session necessary?
> How would that rule look like?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-sub-process-rules-inside-multiple-instances-tp3009981p3014310.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110602/bf85057a/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list