[rules-users] Regression 5.1->5.2 with conflicting ClassNames

[abr]

I second that problem.

Switching from Drools 5.1 to 5.2 or 5.3 brought issues that were resolved by
fully qualifying fact names.

Here are samples illustrating the problem:

*Sample1:*


*Sample2:*


*Sample3 (continues Sample2 as the following is in the same DRL file):*


Like thomas, adding namespace where there was a name conflict resolved the
issues.
However, something seem to go wrong when parsing and, sometimes, executing.

Alexis

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Regression-5-1-5-2-with-conflicting-ClassNames-tp3268164p3460816.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.