[rules-users] Matching consecutive events

jpullmann jaroslav.pullmann at fit.fraunhofer.de
Tue Aug 7 05:40:36 EDT 2012


  Wolfgang, Vincent, Edson, many thanks for your support! 
  A numeric comparison of the the event timestamps did the trick. 

  Now I am wondering, whether using simple arithmetic operators
  instead of explicit (built-in) temporal operators might impact the 
  automatic life-cycle management and cleanup of timed events.

  Are these rules treated equally and do the involved events automatically 
  expire (based on their temporal annotations) ? 

  Best regards 
   Jaroslav

  
  
  
  



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Matching-consecutive-events-tp4018980p4019039.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


More information about the rules-users mailing list