[rules-users] Matching consecutive events
jpullmann
jaroslav.pullmann at fit.fraunhofer.de
Tue Aug 7 05:40:36 EDT 2012
Wolfgang, Vincent, Edson, many thanks for your support!
A numeric comparison of the the event timestamps did the trick.
Now I am wondering, whether using simple arithmetic operators
instead of explicit (built-in) temporal operators might impact the
automatic life-cycle management and cleanup of timed events.
Are these rules treated equally and do the involved events automatically
expire (based on their temporal annotations) ?
Best regards
Jaroslav
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Matching-consecutive-events-tp4018980p4019039.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the rules-users
mailing list