[rules-users] expert mailing list

Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun at gmail.com
Wed Aug 15 04:18:08 EDT 2012


>From my point of view, the user list is becoming increasingly cluttered
with Qs regarding Guvnor, which doesn't interest me at all. A parallel list
guvnor-users at lists.jboss.org might help.

-W


On 15 August 2012 10:12, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:

> Personally, I don't find the user list "high volume".
>
> Perhaps re-categorizing the mailing lists we have works better:-
>
>    - users: newbie type stuff
>
>
>    - dev (rename drools-tech?): technical questions (not just
>    implementation)
>
> My 2c.
>
> On 15 August 2012 00:33, Salaboy <salaboy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Probably a linked in private group can do the job, I dont know if it
>> supports all the features that you mention but at least you have the
>> contacts network to checks who joins and post new topics. With a group of
>> moderators the topics can be restricted easily
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 14 Aug 2012, at 22:48, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
>>
>> > As the user list is now high volume, i'm contemplating an "invite only"
>> expert list. I'm not sure who this would work, or if it's practical. But
>> the idea is to have a lower volume list, with a higher quality of technical
>> questions and discussions. This might make it easier for people to be
>> engaged.
>> >
>> > I'm thinking of doing it as a google group "drools-expert-group" or
>> something.
>> >
>> > I'm not entirely sure how to decide who gets an invite or not…. as it's
>> very arbitrary. I guess in general anyone who gets a recommendation for
>> someone on the list, gets an invite. But I'm open to other ideas to run
>> this.
>> >
>> > Ideally we should be able to setup a number of moderators, that can
>> handle this invite list, including people from the community. Although not
>> sure if google groups supports this, need to find out.
>> >
>> > Anyway would like to here what people think, and would be interest to
>> see alternative ways to do this. Maybe you can point to existing setups,
>> that manage this sort of situation, that we can copy?
>> >
>> > Mark
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120815/dbd27e14/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list