[rules-users] fireUntilHalt() is halt forever
Wolfgang Laun
wolfgang.laun at gmail.com
Tue Aug 21 08:58:42 EDT 2012
Is the consequence of the rule where you call
drools.halt()
really executed?
-W
On 21/08/2012, Rana <ven12344 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I mean to say is that, control does not come back to
> workingMemory.fireUntillHalt(). It just hangs in the rule file itself. Does
> not do anything at all.
>
> What is the use of that.
>
> If I write like halt in the rule then it should stop the rule firing and
> control should be sent back to workingMemory.fireUntillHalt() and execute
> whatever after that.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/fireUntilHalt-is-halt-forever-tp4019146p4019304.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
More information about the rules-users
mailing list