[rules-users] fireUntilHalt() is halt forever

[Wolfgang Laun]

You are not writing rules - you are using rules to disguise the fact
that you are using if statements to process your data.

What is "droolsRequest" and how is it declared? If this were a real rule,
it would be

when
    DroolsRequest( address.stateCode == "MA" )
then
   ...

no-loop is nonsense in a rule that doesn't update any WM data.

-W

On 21 August 2012 17:00, Rana <ven12344 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Here is the example
>
> rule "AndroGel Provider State"
>         no-loop true
>         salience 95
>         agenda-group "AndroGel"
>         when
>                 eval( droolsRequest.address.stateCode == "MA" )
>         then
>                 logging();
>                 drools.halt();
> end
>
> the other rule is very similar but for a different Agenda Group
>
> rule "Pradaxa Provider State"
>         no-loop true
>         salience 95
>         agenda-group "Pradaxa"
>         when
>                 eval( droolsRequest.address.stateCode == "MA" )
>         then
>                 logging();
>                 drools.halt();
> end
>
> In this case it is firing the Pradaxa rule and giving me the wrong output.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/fireUntilHalt-is-halt-forever-tp4019146p4019313.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120821/f8fc1518/attachment.html