[rules-users] Multi-threading inefficiency caused by static class synchronization?

[ping]

Thank you for the advice. That's a good solution if we choose to deploy the
rule engines as standalone services.
We are also evaluating deploy the rule engine as a embedded component in
legacy applications. In this case they have to be in the same JVM.

-Ping



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Multi-threading-inefficiency-caused-by-static-class-synchronization-tp4021160p4021171.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.