[rules-users] Code Coverage

mike mikemps at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 10:22:02 EST 2012


Thank you very much Thomas ... yes, what i need is standard code coverage
... my company is all over that metric

cheers
Mike

2012/1/23 Swindells, Thomas <TSwindells at nds.com>

>  It depends what you are asking for,****
>
> If you just want to know what proportion of rules you have written have
> actually activated then that can be simply achieved by having a
> AgendaEventListener and using it to ‘tick’ rules off when they have been
> triggered – the blog entry should have you achieve this.****
>
> ** **
>
> If you actually want to integrate it with standard java code coverage
> reports then this is a different question and is likely to be much harder,
> if not impossible, ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thomas****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *mike
> *Sent:* 23 January 2012 14:34
> *To:* Rules Users List
>
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Code Coverage****
>
>  ** **
>
> Thank you very much ... as far as i know in order to do code coverage i
> need to instrument the packages i'm interested in covering ... this
> recommendation doesn't take me in that direction****
>
> ** **
>
> It is very useful however in showing a way to test rules individually.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you****
>
> Mike ****
>
> ** **
>
> 2012/1/17 Toni Rikkola <toni.rikkola at gmail.com>****
>
> You need to write the coverage tests for JUnit yourself. Test Scenarios in
> Guvnor do this, but you can't use them outside Guvnor. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Test Scenarios get all the rule names for the rules in one package and
> then compares that list to the rules that fired.****
>
> Edson's blog entry might help you
> http://blog.athico.com/2011/10/cookbook-how-to-test-rules-using-xunit.html
> .****
>
> ** **
>
> Toni****
>
> ** **
>
> On Jan 16, 2012, at 5:49 PM, mike wrote:****
>
> ** **
>
>  Hi there,****
>
> ** **
>
> I was wondering if its possible to measure code coverage on test running
> against a set of rules.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you****
>
> Mike****
>
>  ****
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users****
>
>  ** **
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users****
>
> ** **
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> **************************************************************************************
> This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you
> have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
> postmaster at nds.com and delete it from your system as well as any copies.
> The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS for
> employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please do not
> print this e-mail unless necessary.
>
> NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18
> 4EX, United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered
> no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603 8808 40-00
>
> **************************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120123/62b5762f/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list