[rules-users] Logical insert and cyclic rules dependences

Ansgar Konermann ansgar.konermann at googlemail.com
Mon Jul 2 10:00:37 EDT 2012


Am 02.07.2012 15:29, schrieb zephyr:
> zephyr wrote
>> I want to use "magick" of logical insert to keep dynamically changing
>> inferred facts up to date. The problem are cyclic dependences:
>>
>> "a -> b" means "when a than insertLogical( new b()) end"
>>
>> a -> b
>> b -> c
>> c -> b
>>
>> when i insert "a" b and c are correctly inferred (they check equals so it
>> doesnt loop)
>> but when i remove a they persist, as they make they're rules active
>> because ot the cycle
>>
>> is there a good way to remove such logical facts not supported by inserted
>> data?
>>
> [...]
>
> Hmm maybe there is some kind of better way to deal with this.

b -> c
c -> b

in other words: b and c are logically equivalent.

You can remove one of your symbols b or c and just work with the
remaining one. b and c will always have the same truth value (true/false).

If this does not help, please let me know a bit more about your use case.

Best regards

Ansgar


More information about the rules-users mailing list