[rules-users] NESTED LOOPS Possible

Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun at gmail.com
Fri Jul 20 16:39:47 EDT 2012


Oops, forgot the return type and a typo:

function    boolean    isYafterX( List list, Object    x   , Object y)


On 20 July 2012 22:29, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:

> Determining the truth value of a complex property is best done by writing a
> function, e.g.
>
>    function isYafterX( List list, Object y, Object y)
>
> and by calling this function in an eval() conditional element.
>
> -W
>
>
>
>
> On 20 July 2012 22:18, salt <writemesaltworth at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please let me know nested loops are possible in drools or not..
>>
>> Scenario like this needs to be developed
>>
>>  list  values : A,B,C,D,E,F..
>>
>> Need to set 1 in Action if D is after C.
>>
>> So here i need to loook for D and if got again that list will be iterated
>> and will check for C.
>>
>> Have tried this logic without nested loops and it works fine but
>> performance
>> wise its hitting.
>>
>> So Kindy let me know whether Nested loops are possible or not..
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/NESTED-LOOPS-Possible-tp4018811.html
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120720/76a447d4/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list