[rules-users] Slow compilation (4h) for a single rule

[fx242]

laune wrote
> 
> Well, I do mind the "nonsense Number()". There's no point in
> discussing this if you don't post an exact image of your rule.
> 
> -W
> 

There is a point, because the rule I've posted compiles and causes the same
problem, I've just removed redundant code to expose the problematic section.

TL



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Slow-compilation-4h-for-a-single-rule-tp4018855p4018857.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.