[rules-users] java.lang.NullPointerException at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooFactHandleFactory.newFactHandle(ReteooFactHandleFactory.java:56)

[Carolina Pellecchia]

Hello, I made another test.


I downloaded the source


URL for package source:

http://localhost:8080/guvnor/rest/packages/org.dfms.model/source


from Guvnor, then I saved the file like drl on file system and I tried
loading this drl file through application and all have worked fine.


Our application is using this url:
http://localhost:8080/guvnor/org.drools.guvnor.Guvnor/package/org.dfms.model/LATEST


to loading from Guvnor5.3.0 the pkg. Is it correct?


Thanks in advanced

Carolina


2012/7/24 Vincent LEGENDRE <vincent.legendre at eurodecision.com>

>
> > @Vincent: I'm concerned about the first stack trace line, which is
> > where no executable code can be. Clear this up first...
>
> Me ? Really no idea why this line ...
> This line, in 5.3 code, is the class declaration. Indeed, node an
> executable piece of code ...
>
> I've found another thread :
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Drools-5-4-0-FINAL-and-OSGI-Unable-to-instantiate-service-for-Class-org-drools-concurren-td4017660.html
> where we can see a stack trace giving a
> "org.drools.common.NamedEntryPoint.insert(NamedEntryPoint.java:53) " which
> is the class declaration line in 5.4 source code...
>
> May be that some JVMs points that because there are some static inits in
> the class ?
> Or may be some AOP usage ?
>
> All other line calls (insert etc etc) matches exactly the lines shown in
> the stack trace, so to me, it is not so important ... at least not for the
> problem here.
> The real problem is why ObjectTypeConf conf.getTypeDeclaration();
> returns null using Guvnor compiled pkg and not via DRL local compilation
> ...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120724/bc10767d/attachment.html