[rules-users] Collections versus Relational Approach in Fact Model

[Wolfgang Laun]

You'll also have to learn about handling XML with Java, e.g., using JAXB,
which
comes with JDK.

Given that you have an XML document, unmarshalling creates,
from the XML file, a hierarchy of objects. Usually they are are already
linked in
some way, depending on the way the XML schema is structured. (Typically, a
parent node contains a List of its children.) Then, you walk the document
tree,
inserting some or all of the objects into Working Memory. After firing the
rules,
you simply marshal the document, starting at the root node to create the
output
XML.

-W

On 30 July 2012 20:51, BenjaminWolfe <benjamin.e.wolfe at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm learning Java and Drools at the same time; please be gentle if my
> question is misdirected.
>
> I'm working on creating my first nontrivial fact model.  A policy can have
> multiple vehicles; a vehicle can have multiple coverages.  My data will
> come
> into the rules engine via an XML file, and be output to XML after all rules
> are fired.  I'm looking for best practices.
>
> I've seen it suggested to use a relational approach to my object graph.  A
> policy will have policyID 12345; its vehicles will have a policyID field,
> and each will have a different vehicleNumber (e.g. 1, 2 and 3).  A coverage
> will have policyID (12345) and vehicleNumber(1), and a coverage identifier
> of its own.
>
> That seems simple, sleek and elegant.  I hope to use it to write rules.
>  But
> I wonder if it will be resource-intensive when I get to outputting the XML.
> I'm imagining having to write the policy node, then search all vehicles for
> the 3 that are related to this policy, then search through all coverages
> for
> the ones corresponding to each vehicle, etc.
>
> Is it better to include some sort of collection?  (Policy 12345 might
> include a collection of vehicles, each of which would include a collection
> of coverages.)  If so, what kind of collection: an implementation of set?
> list? map?  More specifically, are there drawbacks or advantages to one
> approach or another?
>
> I'm very thankful for any guidance you'd like to offer.
>
> Best regards,
> Benjamin
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Collections-versus-Relational-Approach-in-Fact-Model-tp4018965.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120730/2aa1fe14/attachment.html