[rules-users] Does Drools Fusion consume a lot of memory?

[Wolfgang Laun]

And why do you talk about two accounts? Normally, you don't know much
about the "foreign" account, except when it is an "in-house"
transaction.

You'll have to redesign.

The Account type you have now is not good for what you intend to do.
It is a snapshot of an Account in a certain state, and therefore it
creates a considerable overhead in your fact database.

There are some mathematically wrong assumptions, too. For instance,
you cannot compute a "balance averaged over 30 days" by taking the
average of so many account updates.

-W



On 28/06/2012, chrisLi <shengtao0077 at 163.com> wrote:
> Oops!
>
>     I did not retract these two accounts after the transaction has been
> processed.  I thought these two
>
> accounts may be used later.  I attempted to update these two accounts with
> session.update(facthandle,
>
> object) with assertbehaviour setting to equality. However, no rules were
> fired.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Does-Drools-Fusion-consume-a-lot-of-memory-tp4018307p4018329.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>