[rules-users] Can I capture the result of an RMI call within a pattern?

[Wolfgang Laun]

You might also consider some sort of caching approach that would make the
second call to remoteService.getLocation() cheap.
-W

On 22 March 2012 19:45, lhorton <LHorton at abclegal.com> wrote:

> That would be a good approach for one location.  My real world rules are 24
> rules for 24 different locations.  If I used your approach, I think I would
> have to look up and insert all 24 locations for each session execution (we
> use stateless sessions) in order to have the 24 setter rules work.
>
> I am trying to avoid too many calls to the RMI service (remote database
> reads), which is why I was trying to put all the work into the one rule
> pattern.  in my real-world rules, there are more conditions in the pattern
> than just the RMI lookup, so that only one of the setter rules will fire
> for
> each session execution.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Can-I-capture-the-result-of-an-RMI-call-within-a-pattern-tp3848873p3849422.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120322/cd9b1219/attachment.html