[rules-users] Is Flow / jBPM dying on the vine?

[Mark Proctor]

What you are talking about is an experimental feature that allows the rules to control the process execution.
http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v5.1/userguide/ch17.html

How to do this is still not documented that well there are some aspects we have to work on to make it simpler - hence why it's really move of an internal experimental feature.  You'd mostly have to speak to kris, who would take you through some unit tests. Find him on irc:
http://www.jboss.org/drools/irc

When we've tidied it up, simplified it and are happier with it, we'll document it and promote it for general purpose use.

Mark

On 8 Nov 2012, at 19:19, dunnlow <dunnlow at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Thank you for the information / update.  
> 
> I notice that almost all of the examples that I find are user task based (or
> more specifically, NOT event-based, which is my use case).  I am planning to
> inform a process largely (but not entirely) with events.  Short of having a
> signal and gateway for every node, I don't see a way of make a jBPM process
> event based (ie pausing at nodes until certain events/rules are satisfied). 
> Is this not a good use case for jBPM?
> 
> -- salaboy, I'll be waiting anxiously for that book ;-)
> 
> Thanks again.  -J
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-Flow-jBPM-dying-on-the-vine-tp4020738p4020764.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users