[rules-users] Is Flow / jBPM dying on the vine?

[dunnlow]

Salaboy, the issue I have is that I want users to be able to see the process
graphically, so I think that means I need one overall process (I may use a
few sub-processes).  Using rules however as you suggest is there a way to
"pause" a process until a message (/signal) with certain criteria is
inserted?  I thought about using a business rule task, with a rule that
would always be false (until the node should allow processing to pass
through), but I could not get that working.

I also saw a suggestion about adding a "Condition" to the metadata for a
timer node, but that doesn't seem to be working either.

Mark - thanks for the information.  I'm looking at flexible processes now
and will be in touch with Kris.

Thanks again,
-J



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-Flow-jBPM-dying-on-the-vine-tp4020738p4020774.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.