[rules-users] JPA vs Marshaller for session persistence

[Mark Proctor]

JPA for working memory is indeed an entire snapshot of the working memory per transaction. So you want to avoid a transaction per WM insert/update/delete.

Mark
On 26 Nov 2012, at 09:57, magnusv <magnus.vojbacke at digitalroute.com> wrote:

> Does this mean that the JPA persistence has to write out the entire
> knowledgesession every time a new fact is inserted?
> 
> I.e. If I have 279 facts, when I insert fact #280, the JPA will write out
> all 280 facts. It has no way of just writing the delta between 279 and 280?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/JPA-vs-Marshaller-for-session-persistence-tp4020955p4020964.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users