[rules-users] Setting value in LHS for access in RHS

[Stephen Masters]

You got it this time ... I'm trying to inspect the field name. As you mention there's a risk that a user could pick a mismatched RHS consequence, so I was hoping to work some DRL magic to avoid that.

So I think I'll get around it by extending my facts and populating them each with the value they should use. It means a lot more up-front calculations, but its probably the safest way.

Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:

>_______________________________________________
>rules-users mailing list
>rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20121130/a3ec0756/attachment.html