[rules-users] semantically equivalent DROOLS L-value expressions?

Cotton.Ben ben.d.cotton.iii at gmail.com
Mon Oct 22 15:44:35 EDT 2012


Hi,I am a DROOLS newbie.  I apologize if this has been asked before.This rule
(R1) is not syntactically correct  in the Eclipse .DRL view. **but R2 is
syntactically correct =**In Drools 5.2, are R1 and R2 semantically
equivalent?



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/semantically-equivalent-DROOLS-L-value-expressions-tp4020423.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20121022/f5d133ff/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list