[rules-users] Abstracting Rules using extends

[Arul Prashanth]

Hi David,

Here are the code to reproduce the issue.  I have attached the Unit Testcase
also along with this.
Vehicles.java
<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4023252/Vehicles.java>  
Vehicle.java <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4023252/Vehicle.java>  
test1.drl <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4023252/test1.drl>  
SampleTest.java
<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4023252/SampleTest.java>  

I was trying to narrow down on this issue over the weekend and below is what
I was able to figure out.

Whenever a Rule has the enabled attribute set to false and a fact that
matches that specific rule exist then we are getting the error described
above. This error doesn't popup if the Rule is either enabled or if a fact
doesn't  match the Rules LHS.

I wasn't able to share the actual code hence had to workaround to reproduce
the same.

Thanks
Arul Prashanth



-----
- Prashanth
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Abstracting-Rules-using-extends-tp4023217p4023252.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.