[rules-users] drools queries: strange dependency

[Upali Kohomban]

An update to my problem:

As per Davide's instructions, I tried with the 5.5.1-SNAPSHOT and the 
problem went away. So I guess the strange behavior was due to some 
unfixed bug in 5.5.0.

Thanks Davide for the kind help.

Upali

On 15/04/2013 03:10, Davide Sottara wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, I would summarize your requirements as follows:
> - you need some "A-box" reasoning, but you are fine with a rule-based 
> approach
> - the object-oriented integration Drools provides is quite convenient
> - you have large data sets for which an opportunistic, 
> "query-oriented" approach
> would work better rather than a fully generative "forward chaining" 
> approach
>
> Drools "hybrid-chaining" approach could be very useful here - I'm not 
> sure how
> well documented it is, and how you are planning to use it, but it 
> would be interesting
> to see one of your rules - even "stripped" of the details you don't 
> want to show -
> to discuss the behaviour of the engine and its implications.
>
> I had a use case apparently very similar to yours some time ago.. I'm 
> working even
> now on some experimental forms of rule/object/ontology integration. 
> The "trait"
> feature might be an alternative to the explicit addition of classes to 
> objects .. it was
> enhanced a few days ago to support updates and modifications.
> If you have an ontology to begin with, you might also be interested in 
> the ontology -> class
> conversion tool I'm working on even now
>
> Davide

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130416/756a54be/attachment.html