[rules-users] Interupting Stateful session

[Wolfgang Laun]

Good enough. Documentation says that the currently executing
rule is terminated, but I guess that's preferable to a harsh interrupt.
Still, depending on what is being done in RHS code, it doesn't
guarantee a consistent end - but a more radical interrupt will even
be worse.
-W

On 31/12/2013, glambert27 <glambe2 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> So I went with:
> ksession.halt();
> ksession.clearAgenda();
> ksession.dispose();
>
> is this not an ideal solution?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Interupting-Stateful-session-tp4027464p4027480.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>