[rules-users] NullPointerException when updating a fact

[Davide Sottara]

Seems they forgot to put 5.6 on CI.. I've asked a few times, with little
success :(
I'll try again.
Otherwise, one would have to download the source code and build it locally

On 07/31/2013 12:53 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Ids there any 5.6.0-x with x != Final to be downloaded?
> -W
>
> On 31/07/2013, Davide Sottara <dsotty at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 5.6 already solves the NPE with this particular ruleset.
>> It is ready to be released, one last issue pending.
>> It will likely be the last of the 5.x series.. anyone willing to give it
>> a try
>> is more than welcome
>> Davide
>>
>>
>> On 07/30/2013 08:06 AM, Stephen Masters wrote:
>>> So far I have stuck with 5.3.0. It's not perfect, but I have found it
>>> pretty good and reliable.
>>>
>>> I think that 5.4.0 was a reasonable improvement, but I haven't used it in
>>> anger. For me, there wasn't enough improvement in it from 5.3 to merit
>>> spending time on an upgrade, so I was waiting for 5.5.0. Maybe others
>>> could chime in on that one.
>>>
>>> I did spend time upgrading my 5.3 project to 5.5.0, because it looked so
>>> promising. But I encountered several critical bugs which meant that large
>>> chunks of Guvnor functionality just didn't work. I fell back to 5.3.0
>>> again.
>>>
>>> I'm really hoping to see 5.5.1 before too long, but I think that it has
>>> been "a couple of weeks away" for the past 6 months, so I'm not holding my
>>> breath. :)
>>>
>>> Given the extent of change in 6, I wouldn't recommend going anywhere near
>>> it unless you're just tinkering with it in your own time to see where
>>> things are going. I'm doing that myself at the moment, but it's hard work
>>> given the lack of documentation or books. I suspect that we'll be hit by a
>>> big wave of books on it before long!
>>>
>>> So I guess that if I was starting a new project for a client, I would
>>> probably go with 5.4.0.Final.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30 Jul 2013, at 15:18, schenka7 <eugen.berenstein at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you Steve, you are right. It was a bug in the 5.5.0.Final.
>>>> After I switched to 5.4.0.Final it started to work.
>>>>
>>>> I was suspecting that the newer version is the one with the most bug
>>>> fixes.
>>>> Apparently I was wrong.
>>>> Which version of Drools would you recommend?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/NullPointerException-when-updating-a-fact-tp4025181p4025217.html
>>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>