[rules-users] Drools 5.5 and Java 1.6 versus 1.7 Question

[Geoffrey De Smet]

I am using OpenJDK 1.7 to run Planner (which requires at least 1.6) and 
therefore drools.
All planner stuff is compiled -source 1.6 and -target 1.6.

I haven't tried a drools using project with -source 1.7 and -target 1.7 yet.
If that fails (and you can verify that -source 1.6 and -target 1.6 
solves it) then please raise a jira and link that jira here.

Op 01-03-13 21:26, André Fróes schreef:
> I'm implementing my model with drools 5.5.0.Final and JDK 1.7 without 
> any issue, my only problem is the lack of knowledge on drools hehe.
>
>
> 2013/3/1 rbiller <billers at verizon.net <mailto:billers at verizon.net>>
>
>     Does anyone know of a compatibility matrix that shows what JDK
>     versions are
>     compatible with Drools 5.5? The documentation mentions at least
>     Java 1.5 is
>     needed, and says some examples may need 1.6.
>
>     I have encountered a problem when classes are compiled with Java
>     1.7, in
>     that if they are referenced by a DRL file, the rules compiler
>     gives the
>     error "[Class] cannot be resolved to a type" for the classes that were
>     compiled (actually the whole jar) with Java 1.7.
>
>     Here is my post when I was trying to resolve that compile issue:
>     Previous post on [Class] cannot be resolved to a type error
>     <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Converting-Drools-3-x-to-5-5-A-JBoss-Rules-compilation-error-MyClassHelper-cannot-be-resolved-to-a-te-td4022529.html>
>
>     The rule compiler error went away when I recompiled the classes
>     and deployed
>     the jar using Java 1.6. Anyone else have an issue with 1.7, or know if
>     Drools 5.5 is supposed to be compatible?
>
>     Thanks,
>     rb
>
>
>
>     --
>     View this message in context:
>     http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-5-and-Java-1-6-versus-1-7-Question-tp4022660.html
>     Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>     _______________________________________________
>     rules-users mailing list
>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130301/0fd73260/attachment.html