[rules-users] Ignore subsequent conditions in a Decision Table based on previous condition
ciberg2
joaoguerra72 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 12 06:03:19 EDT 2013
Hi, I'm new to Drools and I'm implementing rules using Excel decision tables
and I need some of your help.
I have some rules in which depending on a condition the following condition
is not necessary, how can I define a table that akllows to define this?
For instance I have:
CONDITION CONDITION CONDITION ACTION
Y
result1
N N Y
result2
N N N
result3
N Y N
result4
N Y Y
result5
In the example above (I hope you can see it right) if the first condition
value is Y the other 2 conditions values don't matter and despite their
value the result will always be the same.
I wouldn't want to have to write all the possible combinations as these in
the real case will add a lot of complexity to the tables.
How can I accomplish this? Is it possible to do it in Excel? If not, how can
I do it in another way (for instantance with guvnor web-based tables).
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Ignore-subsequent-conditions-in-a-Decision-Table-based-on-previous-condition-tp4022778.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the rules-users
mailing list