[rules-users] Implementing Refraction with Drools

[Mark Proctor]

"poor" is a relative word. It might be fast enough for many people.

If we were to implement this in the core of the code, we could avoid a fair bit of the work you are doing. As we implement "modify in place" all we need to do is ignore any activations that are re-actives via a modify. We wouldn't need to do any tracking.

Mark
On 13 Mar 2013, at 17:50, jrh3 <jrh3 at att.com> wrote:

> Yes, thanks, I think that will do it.  Now back to the performance question:
> earlier in this thread it was mentioned that this strategy had poor
> performance.  How bad is it?  Is there any other alternative in Drools 5.5?
> 
> -Jim
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Implementing-Refraction-with-Drools-tp4021705p4022811.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users