[rules-users] Translate Drools to CLIPS rules

[Stadin, Benjamin]

Indeed, that's what I need. General use case would be to have a "parent" drools engine on a fat server, and small clips based rule engines - knowing at least the parts of the process they have to care about. 

I was also looking into rule exchange between those two, but it seems W3C rule exchange in it's current state is not really useful.
________________________________________
Von: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org [rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] im Auftrag von Wolfgang Laun [wolfgang.laun at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. Mai 2013 18:11
An: Rules Users List
Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Translate Drools to CLIPS rules

On 31 May 2013 13:44, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org<mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:

On 31 May 2013, at 07:43, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com<mailto:wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>> wrote:

> On 31/05/2013, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org<mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>>
>> On 30 May 2013, at 23:36, "Stadin, Benjamin"
>> <Benjamin.Stadin at heidelberg-mobil.com<mailto:Benjamin.Stadin at heidelberg-mobil.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd be  willing to get involved, but since you mention clp to drl only,
>>> will it also be possibly to convert drl to clp?
>> yes. There is already a "DrlDumper" that takes a Rule and dumps it to a
>> string, using a bunch of recursive mvel templates.  You can copy/paste this
>> and have it dump to CLP instead.
> Copy/paste with a whole lot of magic ;-)
yeah the LHS isn't so had, if they stick to simple patterns, the RHS is a whole different kettle of fish :) You can load the RHS into an antlr based java.g grammar, and try and translate it - but it wouldn't be fun.

So probably best first to stick to clp->drl, which is more straight forward. Besides, once you are on DRL, why would you want to go back to CLP :)

OP's primary intention seemed to be a DRL to CLP translator, which - according to your first answer - was classified to be a simple copy/paste endeavour. Not so.

-W


Mark
>
> Wolfgang
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users