[rules-users] Drools Fusion, best practise?!

[Alexander Wolf]

I think its this one:
http://www.redhat.com/rhecm/rest-rhecm/jcr/repository/collaboration/sites%20content/live/redhat/web-cabinet/home/resourcelibrary/whitepapers/brms-design-patterns/rh:pdfFile.pdf

correct me if I am wrong @Wolfgang


On 16.10.2013, at 22:09, kurrent93 <kurrent93 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Are you able to give a link to your paper?
> 
> I'm also trying to implement a similar rule, and as such, would really
> appreciate hearing - and ideally seeing -the best practice approach to this.
> 
> Br
> Anton
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Drools-Fusion-best-practise-tp4026390p4026395.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20131016/3ea34cc7/attachment.bin