[rules-users] Fully qualified name for generated classes

[Lance Leverich]

What would be the fully qualified name for a generated class, that is based
upon a fact type (for example a type named "Foo") that is defined inside a
declarative model?
How is the fully qualified name affected if the model resides in the Global
Area, and is imported into multiple packages?

The reason for my question is that I have the following issue:

In the Global Area, I have a declarative model (named MyModel) with a
definition like...
   declare Foo
      bar: String
      version: String
   end

In a package (com.mypkg.a), I have imported MyModel from the Global Area. I
have a rule like...

   rule "myRuleA"
   ruleflow-group "firstGroup"
   when
      not Foo( bar=="bar" )
   then
      Foo fact = new Foo();
      fact.setBar("bar");
      fact.setVersion("1");
      insert(fact);

In another package (com.mypkg.b), I have also imported MyModel from the
Global Area. I have a rule like

   rule "myRuleB"
  ruleflow-group "secondGroup"
  when
     Foo()
  then
     System.out.println("got at least one Foo");

Looking at logs, the rule myRuleA fires as is appropriate; however, the
rule myRuleB does not fire, even though both ruleflow groups are
represented in the ruleflow. I have verified that both of the ruleflow
groups are activated, using the logs. My best guess at this point is that
the class generated for fact type Foo is different for each package. So,
how can I make sure that I am instantiating and checking for the same type
across packages?



Lance Leverich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130904/a98d3fea/attachment.html