[rules-users] Mocking Guvnor

[Stephen Masters]

Possibly also worth pointing out that inserting a fact and executing a session do not connect to Guvnor anyway?

Although, as Mike mentions, the simplest approach tends to be to create a service which wraps knowledge base access and mock that. Although you could also mock the session.

Although, I must admit I’m not sure what question is being asked...

Steve


On 8 Aug 2014, at 13:07, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:

> I assume you have a service encapsulating your use of Drools?
> 
> Why not mock this service to use an implementation that returns what you need?
> 
> 
> On 8 August 2014 03:13, san_hegde <santhosh.hegde at hp.com> wrote:
> Hi ,
> 
>  
> 
> We have requirement where in during functional testing we do not want to connect to Guvnor rather want to mock it. 
> 
>  
> 
> For example mocking could be like this.
> 
>  
> 
>                 We send Fact object as input during calling knowledgeSession.execute() method and in rule we update the result in that fact object itself. So here can we mock the output fact object, so that during functional testing we no need to connect to Guvnor rather mocked result fact object is returned.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Santhosh Hegde A
> 
> 
> View this message in context: Mocking Guvnor
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20140808/f040bdde/attachment.html